User Tools

Site Tools


observations_of_gnss-satellites_on_the_hobart-ceduna_baseline

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
observations_of_gnss-satellites_on_the_hobart-ceduna_baseline [2016/11/01 02:41]
Lucia Plank [Observations of GNSS-satellites on the Hobart Ceduna baseline]
observations_of_gnss-satellites_on_the_hobart-ceduna_baseline [2016/11/01 03:00]
Lucia Plank [near field model comparison]
Line 5: Line 5:
 First results were presented during the IVS GM in South Africa [[http://​events.saip.org.za/​getFile.py/​access?​contribId=55&​sessionId=6&​resId=0&​materialId=slides&​confId=56|Hellerschmied et al.]]  and the VLBI WS for nera field targets in Bonn ([[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​Hellerschmied_Bonn_2016.pdf|scheduling]],​ [[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​2016_Bonn_Plank.pdf|observations]],​ [[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​McCallum.WS2016.pdf|technical challenges]]). First results were presented during the IVS GM in South Africa [[http://​events.saip.org.za/​getFile.py/​access?​contribId=55&​sessionId=6&​resId=0&​materialId=slides&​confId=56|Hellerschmied et al.]]  and the VLBI WS for nera field targets in Bonn ([[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​Hellerschmied_Bonn_2016.pdf|scheduling]],​ [[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​2016_Bonn_Plank.pdf|observations]],​ [[http://​www3.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/​div/​meetings/​vonft/​pdf-files/​talks/​McCallum.WS2016.pdf|technical challenges]]).
  
-**We have a series (6 hours) of measured delays of multiple GNSS-satellites on the Ho-Cd baseline. If interested, we are happy to share our experience and provide data for comparisons.**  +<​note>​We have a series (6 hours) of measured delays of multiple GNSS-satellites on the Ho-Cd baseline. If interested, we are happy to share our experience and provide data for comparisons.</​note> ​ 
  
 ===== near field model comparison ===== ===== near field model comparison =====
 +
 +M. Rothacher from ETH was interested to compare the modelled delays. [[http://​fourier.phys.utas.edu.au/​wg7/​|131a_vievs.dat]] is a file containing the theoretical delyas calculated with VieVS. Values are in seconds. Time reference is time of signal reception (UT) at station 1. The delay includes the a priori hydrostatic delay as well as the antenna axis offset which is up to 8m for the Hobart26 antenna.
  
  
/home/www/auscope/opswiki/data/pages/observations_of_gnss-satellites_on_the_hobart-ceduna_baseline.txt · Last modified: 2016/11/01 03:00 by Lucia Plank